A Massive Turnout, a Tiny Pass RateThe exam process opened to unprecedented interest: around 29,228 people enrolled, a figure that reflects both the pent-up demand for professional status and the long absence of a clear national framework. Of those, approximately 12,191 candidates actually showed up for the first test in November, an 80-question multiple-choice screening designed to assess general and technical knowledge relevant to guiding. Yet only 230 candidates passed this stage. That means about 0.7% of all enrolled and just 1.8% of test-takers achieved the qualifying score.  For many observers and participants, such a steep cut-off, especially on a first iteration of a national exam, suggests a mismatch between aspirations and reality. Critics argue the test went beyond practical, profession-oriented knowledge, veering into encyclopedic territory that may favour academic study over on-the-ground experience.  Government: Rigor, Not a Roadblock In response to the criticisms, the Ministry of Tourism defended the exam as appropriately “serious and rigorous,” countering years of complaints about lax regional standards and talks of nepotism in training and licensing. According to Mitur, establishing high standards is vital to ensure that tourists are well served and the rising problem of unlicensed guides is addressed.  Officials suggest that fine-tuning of the process is possible as the full exam, which will include written, oral, and practical components, continues. At this point, they argue that judging the system on one round of screening is premature.   A Profession in Transition Italy long operated with regional or provincial certifications for tour guides. These were valid across the European Union, but the lack of a unified national system left gaps in quality and created confusion for both workers and travelers. A series of court rulings, followed by changes tied to EU directives and obligations linked to the PNRR (the national recovery plan), eventually forced the government’s hand.  The new national licensing, with exams tailored to Italian art, history, archaeology, legislation and geography, was designed to replace the patchwork of old rules. But getting the system up and running proved complex, with procedural suspensions and legal challenges along the way.  After 2025 the old regional cards will no longer be enough: from 2026 onward registration in the new national list and passing all licensing stages will be mandatory.   Beyond the Exam: Digital Roles and Free Content Another surprising element of the ministry’s strategy is its recent call for licensed guides to act as content creators for state tourism platforms, including digital promotion of destinations without pay. The ministry has framed this as a visibility opportunity; unions and associations have cautiously welcomed it, though the idea of unpaid labor alongside a fiercely selective licensing process raised eyebrows among professionals.  What This Means for Italy’s Tourism Sector Tourism is one of Italy’s economic pillars, with millions of visitors every year. Yet the number of guides properly registered in the new national system remains relatively small, roughly 14,000 at present. In contrast, tourist flows show little sign of slowing.  This sharp disparity between demand and actual licensed professionals underscores a central tension: how to maintain high professional standards while ensuring access to a vocation that many see as central to interpreting Italy’s extraordinary cultural heritage. As the full licensing process unfolds, and the ministry adjusts the framework based on feedback and results, the sector will be watching closely to see whether the new system strengthens both tourism quality and career prospects, or simply raises barriers to entry

The exam process opened to unprecedented interest: around 29,228 people enrolled, a figure that reflects both the pent-up demand for professional status and the long absence of a clear national framework.  Of those, approximately 12,191 candidates actually showed up for the first test in November, an 80-question multiple-choice screening designed to assess general and technical knowledge relevant to guiding. Yet only 230 candidates passed this stage. That means about 0.7% of all enrolled and just 1.8% of test-takers achieved the qualifying score.  For many observers and participants, such a steep cut-off, especially on a first iteration of a national exam, suggests a mismatch between aspirations and reality. Critics argue the test went beyond practical, profession-oriented knowledge, veering into encyclopedic territory that may favour academic study over on-the-ground experience.  In response to the criticisms, the Ministry of Tourism defended the exam as appropriately “serious and rigorous,” countering years of complaints about lax regional standards and talks of nepotism in training and licensing. According to Mitur, establishing high standards is vital to ensure that tourists are well served and the rising problem of unlicensed guides is addressed.  Officials suggest that fine-tuning of the process is possible as the full exam, which will include written, oral, and practical components, continues. At this point, they argue that judging the system on one round of screening is premature.   Italy long operated with regional or provincial certifications for tour guides. These were valid across the European Union, but the lack of a unified national system left gaps in quality and created confusion for both workers and travelers. A series of court rulings, followed by changes tied to EU directives and obligations linked to the PNRR (the national recovery plan), eventually forced the government’s hand.  The new national licensing, with exams tailored to Italian art, history, archaeology, legislation and geography, was designed to replace the patchwork of old rules. But getting the system up and running proved complex, with procedural suspensions and legal challenges along the way.  After 2025 the old regional cards will no longer be enough: from 2026 onward registration in the new national list and passing all licensing stages will be mandatory.   Another surprising element of the ministry’s strategy is its recent call for licensed guides to act as content creators for state tourism platforms, including digital promotion of destinations without pay. The ministry has framed this as a visibility opportunity; unions and associations have cautiously welcomed it, though the idea of unpaid labor alongside a fiercely selective licensing process raised eyebrows among professionals.  Tourism is one of Italy’s economic pillars, with millions of visitors every year. Yet the number of guides properly registered in the new national system remains relatively small, roughly 14,000 at present. In contrast, tourist flows show little sign of slowing.  This sharp disparity between demand and actual licensed professionals underscores a central tension: how to maintain high professional standards while ensuring access to a vocation that many see as central to interpreting Italy’s extraordinary cultural heritage. As the full licensing process unfolds, and the ministry adjusts the framework based on feedback and results, the sector will be watching closely to see whether the new system strengthens both tourism quality and career prospects, or simply raises barriers to entry