European Fighter Jet Politics Heat Up, Italy Offers Germany a Seat at GCAPEurope’s defence industrial landscape is in flux as rival sixth-generation fighter jet programmes wrestle with strategic, political and technological tensions. At the centre of attention is the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP), a multinational effort involving Italy, the United Kingdom and Japan to build a next-generation combat aircraft, and the rival Future Combat Air System (FCAS), led by France, Germany and Spain. Recent developments suggest Germany could be poised to reconsider its role in Europe’s future airpower plans and potentially align with GCAP, even as internal frictions persist within the project.  The GCAP, launched in late 2022, merges the United Kingdom’s Tempest initiative with Japan’s F-X project to create a sixth-generation multi-role stealth fighter system, intended to enter service by about 2035 and replace existing platforms like the Eurofighter Typhoon and Japan’s Mitsubishi F-2. The programme is underpinned by industrial collaboration through a joint venture called Edgewing, with BAE Systems (UK), Leonardo (Italy) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan) as lead partners.  Italy, long involved in GCAP from the outset, has recently intensified efforts to broaden participation. Defence Minister Guido Crosetto has publicly stated that Germany and other countries such as Australia could join GCAP in future, offering a path for nations currently aligned with FCAS to shift into the programme. “Germany could possibly join this project in the future,” Crosetto told lawmakers, adding that Australia may also be interested in joining the initiative.  The offer comes amid growing challenges for the rival FCAS project, a Franco-German-Spanish initiative that has struggled with industrial disputes, disagreements over leadership and technological direction. Berlin faces mounting pressure from some lawmakers to reconsider its participation in FCAS, as delays and disagreements have hindered progress toward a fielded aircraft. France, meanwhile, appears more committed to the effort, but the uncertainty in Germany has opened space for alternative collaboration.  For Italy, the potential inclusion of Germany, one of Europe’s largest defence industries, represents both a strategic opportunity and a challenge. Bringing in an industrial heavyweight could strengthen the GCAP’s critical mass of investment, talent and technological expertise, but it would require clear terms on governance, work share and intellectual property rights. Analysts note that Germany’s entry at a later stage could mean accepting a reduced industrial role compared with the founding members.  At the same time, Italy’s own role in GCAP has been under scrutiny domestically, as defence spending on the programme has risen sharply. Costs associated with developing the next-generation fighter have expanded from initial estimates of about €6 billion to nearly €18.6 billion, a figure that has drawn criticism from opposition parties at home, even as Rome champions the programme’s long-term strategic value.  The UK and Japan have both affirmed their commitment to GCAP, and the UK has indicated openness to future expansion of the partnership. Reports indicate that the UK, Italy and Japan aim to finalise major contracts and continue development work into 2025, formalising structures under the Edgewing venture.  Whether Germany ultimately chooses to shift away from FCAS towards GCAP could have significant implications for the future of European defence cooperation. A shift would mark a reorientation of strategic alignments in aviation technology and might influence how Europe balances industrial competition with collective security aims. With global tensions and NATO commitments evolving, the decisions made in the next year will shape the continent’s airpower capabilities for decades.  Ph: Formiche.net

Europe’s defence industrial landscape is in flux as rival sixth-generation fighter jet programmes wrestle with strategic, political and technological tensions. At the centre of attention is the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP), a multinational effort involving Italy, the United Kingdom and Japan to build a next-generation combat aircraft, and the rival Future Combat Air System (FCAS), led by France, Germany and Spain. Recent developments suggest Germany could be poised to reconsider its role in Europe’s future airpower plans and potentially align with GCAP, even as internal frictions persist within the project.  The GCAP, launched in late 2022, merges the United Kingdom’s Tempest initiative with Japan’s F-X project to create a sixth-generation multi-role stealth fighter system, intended to enter service by about 2035 and replace existing platforms like the Eurofighter Typhoon and Japan’s Mitsubishi F-2. The programme is underpinned by industrial collaboration through a joint venture called Edgewing, with BAE Systems (UK), Leonardo (Italy) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan) as lead partners.  Italy, long involved in GCAP from the outset, has recently intensified efforts to broaden participation. Defence Minister Guido Crosetto has publicly stated that Germany and other countries such as Australia could join GCAP in future, offering a path for nations currently aligned with FCAS to shift into the programme. “Germany could possibly join this project in the future,” Crosetto told lawmakers, adding that Australia may also be interested in joining the initiative.  The offer comes amid growing challenges for the rival FCAS project, a Franco-German-Spanish initiative that has struggled with industrial disputes, disagreements over leadership and technological direction. Berlin faces mounting pressure from some lawmakers to reconsider its participation in FCAS, as delays and disagreements have hindered progress toward a fielded aircraft. France, meanwhile, appears more committed to the effort, but the uncertainty in Germany has opened space for alternative collaboration.  For Italy, the potential inclusion of Germany, one of Europe’s largest defence industries, represents both a strategic opportunity and a challenge. Bringing in an industrial heavyweight could strengthen the GCAP’s critical mass of investment, talent and technological expertise, but it would require clear terms on governance, work share and intellectual property rights. Analysts note that Germany’s entry at a later stage could mean accepting a reduced industrial role compared with the founding members.  At the same time, Italy’s own role in GCAP has been under scrutiny domestically, as defence spending on the programme has risen sharply. Costs associated with developing the next-generation fighter have expanded from initial estimates of about €6 billion to nearly €18.6 billion, a figure that has drawn criticism from opposition parties at home, even as Rome champions the programme’s long-term strategic value.  The UK and Japan have both affirmed their commitment to GCAP, and the UK has indicated openness to future expansion of the partnership. Reports indicate that the UK, Italy and Japan aim to finalise major contracts and continue development work into 2025, formalising structures under the Edgewing venture.  Whether Germany ultimately chooses to shift away from FCAS towards GCAP could have significant implications for the future of European defence cooperation. A shift would mark a reorientation of strategic alignments in aviation technology and might influence how Europe balances industrial competition with collective security aims. With global tensions and NATO commitments evolving, the decisions made in the next year will shape the continent’s airpower capabilities for decades.  Ph: Formiche.net