Monday 13 April 2026 08:04
L'Espresso Cover on West Bank Abuses Draws Enraged Response from Israel
Italian Weekly's Depiction of a Settler Photographing a Palestinian Woman Prompts Diplomatic Protest and a Wider Debate on Press Freedom and AntisemitismA single magazine cover has ignited a diplomatic row between Italy and Israel, reopened a bruising debate about the limits of press freedom, and put one of Italy's most venerable weekly publications at the centre of an international controversy.The latest issue of L'Espresso, one of Italy's oldest and most widely read news magazines, carries a cover image titled "L'abuso" โ The Abuse. It shows a man wearing a kippah and peyot, the side curls of Orthodox Jewish men, pointing a mobile phone at a woman wearing a patterned hijab. He is an armed Israeli settler. She is a Palestinian girl. What strikes the viewer most is not the religious or civilisational contrast but the dehumanising smirk on the settler's face as he films the Arab girl, whose expression is one of pain, one of the victims of the increasingly frequent raids in the West Bank.
The photograph is part of a documentary project by Italian photographer Pietro Masturzo. The cover article, written by Daniele Mastrogiacomo, examines the project of "Greater Israel," its biblical roots, and its collision with international law. A companion piece by Alae Al Said, accompanied by Masturzo's full reportage, describes what the magazine calls a campaign of ethnic cleansing in the West Bank following what it characterises as the genocide of Gaza
Israel's Response
The reaction from the Israeli side was swift and forceful. Israel's ambassador to Italy, Jonathan Peled, took to X to write: "We strongly condemn the manipulative use of the recent L'Espresso cover. The image distorts the complex reality Israel must live with, promoting stereotypes and hatred. Responsible journalism must be balanced and accurate."ย
The criticism did not stop at diplomacy. Moked, the main platform of Italian Jewish community life, described the cover as "a festival of stereotypes," arguing that depicting the Israeli soldier as ugly and menacing, with the particular aggravating details of the peyot and the IDF uniform, amounted to a form of essentialising negative characteristics onto an entire population. The platform questioned whether the cover's purpose was "to inform or to indoctrinate," and called on Italy's Order of Journalists to apply the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, which the Order had formally adopted just days earlier, on 31 March, with a stated commitment to fighting antisemitism alongside all other forms of racism and discrimination.
The Magazine Stands Firm
L'Espresso has not retracted the cover or issued any apology. The editorial position is stated plainly in the magazine's own presentation of the issue. The image documents, in the magazine's words, "the daily abuses suffered by those who had the misfortune of being born in the territories that settlers claim to occupy in order to realise the dream of Greater Israel," describing settler crimes as continuous, backed by the Israeli army, and met with no meaningful condemnation from the international community.ย
The public response to the Israeli ambassador's intervention was overwhelmingly hostile to his position. The cover was widely reshared on social media by users who framed the diplomatic protest itself as an attempt to suppress legitimate photojournalism.
A Wider Debate
The row arrives at a moment when the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, amplified by the war in Iran and Israel's ongoing bombardment of Lebanon, is reshaping media debate across Europe with unusual intensity. Every image from the region now carries political weight that extends far beyond its immediate subject.
Critics of the cover argue that choosing a single image of a grinning Orthodox-looking soldier to represent an entire conflict, a country, and a military, risks reinforcing precisely the kind of collective negative characterisation that anti-discrimination frameworks are designed to prohibit, regardless of whether the underlying reporting is factually sound.ย
Defenders of the cover argue the opposite: that the photograph documents a real moment, that photojournalism's purpose is to make visible what power would prefer to keep hidden, and that discomfort with an image is not the same as evidence of bias.
The cover story itself connects the individual image to a broader pattern: the Israeli government has recently approved 27,000 new settlement units in the West Bank and 37,000 in East Jerusalem, despite UN condemnation, while settlers operate with what the magazine describes as total impunity, forcing Palestinian family after family to abandon their land.
Whether the cover is journalism or provocation, reportage or indoctrination, depends entirely on where the reader stands in a conflict where that question has become unanswerable by consensus. L'Espresso answered it with an image. The argument about that answer is unlikely to end soon.ย
ย
#news #politics
read the news on Wanted in Rome - News in Italy - Rome's local English news
A single magazine cover has ignited a diplomatic row between Italy and Israel, reopened a bruising debate about the limits of press freedom, and put one of Italy's most venerable weekly publications at the centre of an international controversy.
The latest issue of L'Espresso, one of Italy's oldest and most widely read news magazines, carries a cover image titled "L'abuso" โ The Abuse. It shows a man wearing a kippah and peyot, the side curls of Orthodox Jewish men, pointing a mobile phone at a woman wearing a patterned hijab. He is an armed Israeli settler. She is a Palestinian girl. What strikes the viewer most is not the religious or civilisational contrast but the dehumanising smirk on the settler's face as he films the Arab girl, whose expression is one of pain, one of the victims of the increasingly frequent raids in the West Bank.
The photograph is part of a documentary project by Italian photographer Pietro Masturzo. The cover article, written by Daniele Mastrogiacomo, examines the project of "Greater Israel," its biblical roots, and its collision with international law. A companion piece by Alae Al Said, accompanied by Masturzo's full reportage, describes what the magazine calls a campaign of ethnic cleansing in the West Bank following what it characterises as the genocide of Gaza
![Jews]()
Israel's Response The reaction from the Israeli side was swift and forceful. Israel's ambassador to Italy, Jonathan Peled, took to X to write: "We strongly condemn the manipulative use of the recent L'Espresso cover. The image distorts the complex reality Israel must live with, promoting stereotypes and hatred. Responsible journalism must be balanced and accurate."ย The criticism did not stop at diplomacy. Moked, the main platform of Italian Jewish community life, described the cover as "a festival of stereotypes," arguing that depicting the Israeli soldier as ugly and menacing, with the particular aggravating details of the peyot and the IDF uniform, amounted to a form of essentialising negative characteristics onto an entire population. The platform questioned whether the cover's purpose was "to inform or to indoctrinate," and called on Italy's Order of Journalists to apply the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, which the Order had formally adopted just days earlier, on 31 March, with a stated commitment to fighting antisemitism alongside all other forms of racism and discrimination. L'Espresso has not retracted the cover or issued any apology. The editorial position is stated plainly in the magazine's own presentation of the issue. The image documents, in the magazine's words, "the daily abuses suffered by those who had the misfortune of being born in the territories that settlers claim to occupy in order to realise the dream of Greater Israel," describing settler crimes as continuous, backed by the Israeli army, and met with no meaningful condemnation from the international community.ย The public response to the Israeli ambassador's intervention was overwhelmingly hostile to his position. The cover was widely reshared on social media by users who framed the diplomatic protest itself as an attempt to suppress legitimate photojournalism. The row arrives at a moment when the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, amplified by the war in Iran and Israel's ongoing bombardment of Lebanon, is reshaping media debate across Europe with unusual intensity. Every image from the region now carries political weight that extends far beyond its immediate subject. Critics of the cover argue that choosing a single image of a grinning Orthodox-looking soldier to represent an entire conflict, a country, and a military, risks reinforcing precisely the kind of collective negative characterisation that anti-discrimination frameworks are designed to prohibit, regardless of whether the underlying reporting is factually sound.ย Defenders of the cover argue the opposite: that the photograph documents a real moment, that photojournalism's purpose is to make visible what power would prefer to keep hidden, and that discomfort with an image is not the same as evidence of bias. The cover story itself connects the individual image to a broader pattern: the Israeli government has recently approved 27,000 new settlement units in the West Bank and 37,000 in East Jerusalem, despite UN condemnation, while settlers operate with what the magazine describes as total impunity, forcing Palestinian family after family to abandon their land. Whether the cover is journalism or provocation, reportage or indoctrination, depends entirely on where the reader stands in a conflict where that question has become unanswerable by consensus. L'Espresso answered it with an image. The argument about that answer is unlikely to end soon.ย
Israel's Response The reaction from the Israeli side was swift and forceful. Israel's ambassador to Italy, Jonathan Peled, took to X to write: "We strongly condemn the manipulative use of the recent L'Espresso cover. The image distorts the complex reality Israel must live with, promoting stereotypes and hatred. Responsible journalism must be balanced and accurate."ย The criticism did not stop at diplomacy. Moked, the main platform of Italian Jewish community life, described the cover as "a festival of stereotypes," arguing that depicting the Israeli soldier as ugly and menacing, with the particular aggravating details of the peyot and the IDF uniform, amounted to a form of essentialising negative characteristics onto an entire population. The platform questioned whether the cover's purpose was "to inform or to indoctrinate," and called on Italy's Order of Journalists to apply the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, which the Order had formally adopted just days earlier, on 31 March, with a stated commitment to fighting antisemitism alongside all other forms of racism and discrimination. L'Espresso has not retracted the cover or issued any apology. The editorial position is stated plainly in the magazine's own presentation of the issue. The image documents, in the magazine's words, "the daily abuses suffered by those who had the misfortune of being born in the territories that settlers claim to occupy in order to realise the dream of Greater Israel," describing settler crimes as continuous, backed by the Israeli army, and met with no meaningful condemnation from the international community.ย The public response to the Israeli ambassador's intervention was overwhelmingly hostile to his position. The cover was widely reshared on social media by users who framed the diplomatic protest itself as an attempt to suppress legitimate photojournalism. The row arrives at a moment when the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, amplified by the war in Iran and Israel's ongoing bombardment of Lebanon, is reshaping media debate across Europe with unusual intensity. Every image from the region now carries political weight that extends far beyond its immediate subject. Critics of the cover argue that choosing a single image of a grinning Orthodox-looking soldier to represent an entire conflict, a country, and a military, risks reinforcing precisely the kind of collective negative characterisation that anti-discrimination frameworks are designed to prohibit, regardless of whether the underlying reporting is factually sound.ย Defenders of the cover argue the opposite: that the photograph documents a real moment, that photojournalism's purpose is to make visible what power would prefer to keep hidden, and that discomfort with an image is not the same as evidence of bias. The cover story itself connects the individual image to a broader pattern: the Israeli government has recently approved 27,000 new settlement units in the West Bank and 37,000 in East Jerusalem, despite UN condemnation, while settlers operate with what the magazine describes as total impunity, forcing Palestinian family after family to abandon their land. Whether the cover is journalism or provocation, reportage or indoctrination, depends entirely on where the reader stands in a conflict where that question has become unanswerable by consensus. L'Espresso answered it with an image. The argument about that answer is unlikely to end soon.ย
ย
