Roberto Vannacci Leaves Lega, Signals New Political PathIn a move that marks a clear break within Italy’s right wing, General Roberto Vannacci has formally left the Lega after a protracted period of rising tensions with party leadership, ending a partnership that had lasted since his nomination as deputy secretary under Matteo Salvini. The announcement came on February 3 during a meeting of the Lega’s Federal Council, where the long-anticipated departure was confirmed after weeks of speculation.  Vannacci, a former army general and one of the most controversial figures in the Lega, had already laid the groundwork for an independent political project, registering the symbol and name of a new movement called Futuro Nazionale. In recent days the general had insisted that he was not leaving the party, even as his actions suggested otherwise, prompting intense discussion within the right about the future direction of conservative politics in Italy.  The split followed a direct meeting between Vannacci and Salvini, described by sources as frank but ultimately unsuccessful in reconciling their differences. According to party insiders, the rift had been growing for weeks, driven in part by Vannacci’s increasingly outspoken positions and strategic moves that deviated from the party line. His encouragement to some Lega deputies to vote against a parliamentary resolution on Ukraine, contrary to the official stance of the party, was cited as one of the key points of friction.  At the Federal Council session where his departure was formalised, Vannacci delivered a conciliatory message to Salvini, writing “Ti voglio bene, ma la mia strada è un’altra”, signalling not personal hostility but a distinct philosophical and political divergence. With the new party’s symbol already official, Vannacci now looks set to assume the role of secretary of Futuro Nazionale and position himself as a leader in a more hard-line, sovereigntist political bloc ahead of national elections.  The impact of the split on the broader right is already being debated. Some analysts view Futuro Nazionale as an attempt to capture a segment of the electorate disillusioned with mainstream parties, offering a more radical alternative to established conservative forces. Others warn that a break from the Lega could fragment the vote on the right, particularly if Vannacci’s movement fails to cross electoral thresholds independently.  Within the Lega itself, reactions to Vannacci’s exit have been mixed. Senior figures such as vice-secretary Claudio Durigon publicly urged the general to remain, arguing that splinter projects risk weakening the centre-right and inadvertently benefit the left. Durigon emphasised the importance of unity and warned that alternative formations outside the Lega could hand advantage to political opponents.  Observers also point to broader internal divisions over the direction of the Lega under Salvini’s leadership. Vannacci’s departure underscores tensions between those seeking to maintain a more mainstream conservative imprint and factions urging a harder ideological shift on issues like migration, national sovereignty and social identity. The unfolding situation is likely to have important implications for Italian politics in the coming months. With national elections approaching, the question now is whether Futuro Nazionale can transform Vannacci’s personal brand into a durable political force, or whether his departure will instead highlight the challenges of sustaining far-right alternatives outside established party structures.

In a move that marks a clear break within Italy’s right wing, General Roberto Vannacci has formally left the Lega after a protracted period of rising tensions with party leadership, ending a partnership that had lasted since his nomination as deputy secretary under . The announcement came on February 3 during a meeting of the Lega’s Federal Council, where the long-anticipated departure was confirmed after weeks of speculation.  Vannacci, a former army general and one of the most controversial figures in the Lega, had already laid the groundwork for an , registering the symbol and name of a new movement called Futuro Nazionale. In recent days the general had insisted that he was not leaving the party, even as his actions suggested otherwise, prompting intense discussion within the right about the future direction of conservative politics in Italy.  The split followed a direct meeting between Vannacci and Salvini, described by sources as frank but ultimately unsuccessful in reconciling their differences. According to party insiders, the rift had been growing for weeks, driven in part by Vannacci’s increasingly outspoken positions and strategic moves that deviated from the party line. His encouragement to some Lega deputies to vote against a parliamentary resolution on Ukraine, contrary to the official stance of the party, was cited as one of the key points of friction.  At the Federal Council session where his departure was formalised, Vannacci delivered a conciliatory message to Salvini, writing “Ti voglio bene, ma la mia strada è un’altra”, signalling not personal hostility but a distinct philosophical and political divergence. With the new party’s symbol already official, Vannacci now looks set to assume the role of secretary of Futuro Nazionale and position himself as a leader in a more hard-line, sovereigntist political bloc ahead of national elections.  The impact of the split on the broader right is already being debated. Some analysts view Futuro Nazionale as an attempt to capture a segment of the electorate disillusioned with mainstream parties, offering a more radical alternative to established conservative forces. Others warn that a break from the Lega could fragment the vote on the right, particularly if Vannacci’s movement fails to cross electoral thresholds independently.  Within the Lega itself, reactions to Vannacci’s exit have been mixed. Senior figures such as vice-secretary Claudio Durigon publicly urged the general to remain, arguing that splinter projects risk weakening the centre-right and inadvertently benefit the left. Durigon emphasised the importance of unity and warned that alternative formations outside the Lega could hand advantage to political opponents.  Observers also point to broader internal divisions over the direction of the Lega under Salvini’s leadership. Vannacci’s departure underscores tensions between those seeking to maintain a more mainstream conservative imprint and factions urging a harder ideological shift on issues like migration, national sovereignty and social identity. The unfolding situation is likely to have important implications for Italian politics in the coming months. With national elections approaching, the question now is whether Futuro Nazionale can transform Vannacci’s personal brand into a durable political force, or whether his departure will instead highlight the challenges of sustaining far-right alternatives outside established party structures.